On Friday, July 30, 2016, the US 4th Circus Court of Appeals enjoined several provisions of the 2013 North Carolina Voting Reforms Bill. There are multiple components to the NC VIVA (Voter Information Verification Act) Law, with the Photo ID provision being the piece, which has received the most publicity. But is the Photo ID provision the real focus when it comes to organized systematic voter fraud? I am starting to think maybe not. What are the other specific provisions, which play in to why a Democrat panel of judges might want to strike those parts of the law down, if assisting voter fraud is their goal? And yes, I’m going to go there. We are at a point in the battle for the heart and soul of the Republic that the true Progressives know they are losing. And the judges who have been instrumental in the destruction and undermining of the Rule of Law are acting as if they are wild animals cornered in a box canyon. These three judges on the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals appear to have no reluctance to act against logic and judicial precedence to attempt to save their “movement”.
In reading through the 83-page ruling there are certain things that just stick out “like a sore thumb” in how these judges reached their decision. One is they reference on multiple occasions the historical evidence of “race-based” discriminatory voting laws legislation since 1980. They also reference several times that the voting law changes were “partisan” based. Now, most people who follow North Carolina know that for the first 30 years since 1980 the Democrats dominated the State Legislature and “adjusted” the election laws to attempt to protect their control position, some contend through helping facilitate operational systematic voter fraud. But the judges repeatedly used this “history” to justify striking down the provisions in the law that were enacted to correct these questionable actions by the previous Democrat Legislatures. Does that make any sense at all?
Another item that stands out to me is that these three judges have absolutely no question that African-American Citizens, residing in the State of North Carolina, are truly inferior to their white fellow Citizens. And they believe with out question that the single, and in most cases only, factor to be considered in determining the intellect or capabilities of any Citizen in the State of North Carolina, is the color of their skin. Also, to these three judges, and as expressed in their opinion both political parties, only see the Black Citizens in the State of North Carolina as a monolithic “herd”, which must be dealt with as such. The judges also evidently believe that many African-American Citizens in the State of North Carolina will operate regularly in an unlawful manner unless provided judicial relief.
So, what are the other provisions of the ruling that may be more conducive to voter fraud than even removing the Photo ID provision?
1. Restores “Same-day Registration” and voting during early voting.
This has long been known as a vehicle for organized voter fraud, particularly when there is no Photo ID or easy means to verify the “documents” that are to be acceptable for voting, which can be easily produced in counterfeit. Same day registration virtually eliminates the opportunity to verify citizenship or residence.
Note: As of May 2016 only 16 States and the DC allow “Same-day Registration” and voting. Neither SC or VA allow it. How can this be seen as a “racially discriminatory” action?
2. Restores extended early voting period.
Because the mechanism of early voting is done using fewer polling locations it eliminates the requirement that Citizens vote in their own precinct and enhances the opportunity for fraud, particularly with no Photo ID to verify a voter’s address or citizenship. By extending the length of early voting it allows more opportunities for the same person, or people, to use same-day registration to vote multiple times.
Note 2: As of February 2016 only 34 States and the DC allow ANY early voting, and again, neither SC or VA allow it. So again, how can this be seen as a “racially discriminatory” action?
3. Restores “Out of Precinct” voting.
I’ll be perfectly honest; I don’t really understand this one. Because of the change, a voter will be allowed to cast a ballot that may never be counted, or under the law, they would have been directed to their correct voting location where their vote would be certain to count. Now you will be able to cast a “provisional” ballot if you vote out of your precinct. A provisional ballot is only ever counted if at the time of the canvass (final vote certification after the election) there is the possibility that the numbers of provisional ballots are large enough to possibly change the outcome of any given race. If not, they go straight to the shredder.
4. Restores “Preregistration” for 16 & 17 Year-olds
Evidently there were a large number of African-American High School students who were preregistering who would evidently in the eyes of these judges be either incapable or unwilling or uncaring enough to register to vote if they aren’t given that opportunity to do so at 16 or 17.
These are the provisions of the Law that these three racist Democrat-appointed judges found unconstitutional. Why? Because these judges, in their infinite wisdom, were able to determine, as if by Divine Inspiration or visionary wisdom, that the majority of the North Carolina Legislature passed these provisions of this law solely because they practiced, and legislated with “racial discriminatory intent”. Aren’t you glad we have such incredibly grand men serving on the federal bench? Yes, me too. Now why would I say these judges are racist? Because they ruled that the Black Citizens in the State of North Carolina are either too stupid, too lazy or too disinterested in the voting process to with 3+ years notice, acquire a FREE proper State-issued Photo ID, and then follow the same rules that are required of every other Citizen who doesn’t share their skin color to vote. I rest my case.
God Bless America! And America Bless God Again!
